Anders Logg skrev den 16/09-2008 følgende: > We use lowerCamelCase for function names, but this looks a little > silly when we map function names in the the wrapper classes DofMap > and FiniteElement: > > ufc::dof_map::global_dimension() --> dolfin::DofMap::globalDimension() > > Do we want to keep using lowerCamelCase for function names, or should > we use global_dimension() etc? > > A change should not be very visible in the user interface, partly > because I think lowerCamelCase looks ugly and have tried to avoid > using it in the past (which is why many functions have short and > cryptic names like init(), update()...). :-)
I think consistency is more important than aesthetics :) CamelCaps and function names with _ is, as far as I see it, consistent. Ola > -- > Anders > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
