On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:05:04AM +0200, Ola Skavhaug wrote: > Anders Logg skrev den 16/09-2008 følgende: > > We use lowerCamelCase for function names, but this looks a little > > silly when we map function names in the the wrapper classes DofMap > > and FiniteElement: > > > > ufc::dof_map::global_dimension() --> dolfin::DofMap::globalDimension() > > > > Do we want to keep using lowerCamelCase for function names, or should > > we use global_dimension() etc? > > > > A change should not be very visible in the user interface, partly > > because I think lowerCamelCase looks ugly and have tried to avoid > > using it in the past (which is why many functions have short and > > cryptic names like init(), update()...). :-) > > I think consistency is more important than aesthetics :) > > CamelCaps and function names with _ is, as far as I see it, consistent. > > Ola
Other opinions? Garth? -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
