Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:05:04AM +0200, Ola Skavhaug wrote: >> Anders Logg skrev den 16/09-2008 følgende: >>> We use lowerCamelCase for function names, but this looks a little >>> silly when we map function names in the the wrapper classes DofMap >>> and FiniteElement: >>> >>> ufc::dof_map::global_dimension() --> dolfin::DofMap::globalDimension() >>> >>> Do we want to keep using lowerCamelCase for function names, or should >>> we use global_dimension() etc? >>> >>> A change should not be very visible in the user interface, partly >>> because I think lowerCamelCase looks ugly and have tried to avoid >>> using it in the past (which is why many functions have short and >>> cryptic names like init(), update()...). :-) >> I think consistency is more important than aesthetics :) >> >> CamelCaps and function names with _ is, as far as I see it, consistent. >> >> Ola > > Other opinions? Garth? >
I don't have a strong opinion other than liking consistency. Garth > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
