On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:16:11PM +0200, Ola Skavhaug wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Anders Logg<[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:38:55PM +0200, Ola Skavhaug wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Anders Logg<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:54:32PM +0200, Ola Skavhaug wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Anders Logg<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > There seem to be only a few issues remaining before we can make a >> >> >> > release: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > https://launchpad.net/dolfin/+milestone/0.93 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > In summary: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > 1. Parallel parsing of MeshFunctions >> >> >> >> >> >> What is the status on the solution to this? >> >> >> >> >> >> The right fix is to extend MeshFunction storage to contain the mapping >> >> >> from the mesh entity to vertex numbers. The quick fix (that would fix >> >> >> vertex and cell MeshFunctions) would be to store the global cell >> >> >> numbers read from file. The latter solution is simple, and could be >> >> >> done with little effort, whereas the first is a bit more involved. >> >> >> Your calls. >> >> > >> >> > I think we should make a release as soon as we can and then a new >> >> > release in about a month. I have some things planned for that release. >> >> > >> >> > My suggestion is that we aim for the correct solution and postpone >> >> > that to 0.94. Then it would be enough to make a call to >> >> > not_working_in_parallel() in a suitable place (reading MeshFunctions). >> >> > >> >> > We also need to solve (or disable) 3. plotting from C++ in >> >> > parallel. What's your opinion on that one? >> >> >> >> From a debugging point of view, having runtime plotting in parallel is >> >> nice but not needed. The most important aspect of Viper is to provide >> >> direct feedback when setting up a problem. Knowing that the scalar >> >> version of dolfin works should be sufficient in this respect. >> > >> > It works fine from Python (I think) but not from C++. We could leave >> > it as it is for now and issue a sensible error message instead. >> > >> > >> >> I agree. Lets reconsider this issue sometime before the stable release. >> >> Ola > > ok, so it just remains to > > 1. Check parallel speedup (I don't think anyone has dared to try this yet). > > 2. Make all demos run or exit gracefully in parallel.
Will do the latter. Implementing global cell numbering from file now, to make more demos work. Ola > -- > Anders > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkqpYf8ACgkQTuwUCDsYZdG8vgCfYas3uorqlTACgwn1gdCz1y2C > bw0An1os3XeYM/NeQ623QjyMDBcM/psk > =PIvv > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > > -- Ola Skavhaug _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
