Anders Logg wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:20:15AM +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> >> Anders Logg wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:57:19PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:30:55PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote: >>>> >>>>> ok, so it just remains to >>>>> >>>>> 1. Check parallel speedup (I don't think anyone has dared to try this >>>>> yet). >>>> Does anyone have time/resources to make a quick/simple check of the >>>> speedup we get for some simple test case? Johan? Niclas? >>>> >>>>> 2. Make all demos run or exit gracefully in parallel. >>>> The current demos are still failing in parallel: >>>> >>>> [**] demo/fem/simple/cpp >>>> [**] demo/fem/simple/python >>>> [**] demo/function/eval/cpp >>>> [**] demo/function/eval/python >>>> [**] demo/mesh/meshfunction/cpp --> Ola >>>> [**] demo/pde/mixed-poisson/cpp >>>> [**] demo/pde/mixed-poisson/python >>>> >>>> Please take a look and see if you know what to do. >>> The interpolation bug and most of the above demos have been fixed so >>> it remains just to >>> >>> 1. Check parallel speedup >>> >>> Does anyone have a current DOLFIN build on bigblue.simula.no? Hake? >>> >> I don't think that this is necessary for a release. We won't make any >> changes to the code at this stage based on the results. >> >> Garth > > I think it would be good to have some confidence that we actually get > some speedup. We won't make any changes but it will be good to know > how good (or bad) it is. It should also be fairly easy to check. >
Yes, but why should the release depend on this if we're not going to make changes? Garth > -- > Anders > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
