On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > Anders Logg wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:20:15AM +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> > >> Anders Logg wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:57:19PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:30:55PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> ok, so it just remains to > >>>>> > >>>>> 1. Check parallel speedup (I don't think anyone has dared to try this > >>>>> yet). > >>>> Does anyone have time/resources to make a quick/simple check of the > >>>> speedup we get for some simple test case? Johan? Niclas? > >>>> > >>>>> 2. Make all demos run or exit gracefully in parallel. > >>>> The current demos are still failing in parallel: > >>>> > >>>> [**] demo/fem/simple/cpp > >>>> [**] demo/fem/simple/python > >>>> [**] demo/function/eval/cpp > >>>> [**] demo/function/eval/python > >>>> [**] demo/mesh/meshfunction/cpp --> Ola > >>>> [**] demo/pde/mixed-poisson/cpp > >>>> [**] demo/pde/mixed-poisson/python > >>>> > >>>> Please take a look and see if you know what to do. > >>> The interpolation bug and most of the above demos have been fixed so > >>> it remains just to > >>> > >>> 1. Check parallel speedup > >>> > >>> Does anyone have a current DOLFIN build on bigblue.simula.no? Hake? > >>> > >> I don't think that this is necessary for a release. We won't make any > >> changes to the code at this stage based on the results. > >> > >> Garth > > > > I think it would be good to have some confidence that we actually get > > some speedup. We won't make any changes but it will be good to know > > how good (or bad) it is. It should also be fairly easy to check. > > > > Yes, but why should the release depend on this if we're not going to > make changes? > > Garth
So we know the shape of the code we release. -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
