In my opinion, as long as Dolibarr is stable there's no need to make a LTS version, if the Dolibarr team decides to make a modification to the code that brokens backwards compatibility I think that it is because that's the correct way. It is our job as developers, to fix compatibility in third-party modules with newer versions, but it is not our job to care about people not upgrading their modules.
I know many people won't agree with me and I think my opinion is like "Planned obsolescence" but the web changes every day and I think that we cannot stay in old days... Regards, *Marcos García* [email protected] 2012/7/30 Régis Houssin <[email protected]> > I would be ok for an LTS version with the 3.2 > > > Le 30/07/12 16:46, i.d & l a écrit : > > +1 on my side for a Long Term Support version that would keep being > supported for a while... at least 2 years. > > Best regards/Bien cordialement, > > Manuel PINTOR > > [image: i.d & l - informatique durable & libre - http://idl-mp.com] > <http://idl-mp.com> > 06 67 92 60 36 > http://idl-mp.com > i.d & l sur identi.ca <http://identi.ca/idl> > > Faites un geste pour la planète, n'imprimez ce message que si nécessaire. > Le 30/07/2012 16:42, aurelien Imhof a écrit : > > Hello , > > > Je suis avec la version 3.1, que j'ai mise a jour il y a quelques mois. > toutefois , le temps de voir apparaître certain module en version 3.2, je ne > souhaite pas upgrader tout de suite. > > Resultat , je me retrouve avec certain bug corrigé dans la version 3.2. > > Ma question est simple, n'y aurait il pas interet, afin de stabiliser la > version utilisé en production a proposer une version en LTS à l'instar ubuntu. > > Vu de ma porte, ce permettrait de limiter les upgrades incessant sur les > instance de mes clients. > > Ca vous parle ? > > > > --- en -- > > I'm using version 3.1, I updated a few months ago. however, the time of seeing > certain module in version 3.2, I do not wish to upgrade immediately. > > Result, I end up with some bug fixed in version 3.2. > > My question is simple, there would he no interest, to stabilize the version > used in production to propose an LTS version like Ubuntu. > > Seen from my door, it would reduce the constant upgrades on instance of my > clients. > > It speaks to you? > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dolibarr-dev mailing > [email protected]https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev > > > Cordialement, > -- > Régis Houssin > --------------------------------------------------------- > Cap-Networks > Cidex 1130 > 34, route de Gigny > 71240 MARNAY > FRANCE > VoIP: +33 1 83 62 40 03 > GSM: +33 6 33 02 07 97 > Web: http://www.cap-networks.com/ > Email: [email protected] > > Dolibarr developer: [email protected] > Web Portal: http://www.dolibarr.fr/ > SaaS offers: http://www.dolibox.fr/ > Shop: http://www.dolistore.com/ > Development platform: https://doliforge.org/ > --------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > Dolibarr-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev > >
<<image/jpeg>>
_______________________________________________ Dolibarr-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dolibarr-dev
