> I think we should implement Canonical XML and XML Signature on top of dom4j > by ourself. Tell me what you think about this and then I starting with > implementation tomorrow. Could become high traffic on this list now ;-) Canonical is almost trivial once full xpath (with document-ordering) is available. And I'm working on that aspect now... -bob _______________________________________________ dom4j-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev
- [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j toby-wan-kenobi
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j bob mcwhirter
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j James Strachan
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j toby-wan-kenobi
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j bob mcwhirter
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j toby-wan-kenobi
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j bob mcwhirter
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j James Strachan
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j toby-wan-kenobi
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j Jakob Jenkov
- Re: [dom4j-dev] IBM's XML Security Kit and dom4j James Strachan