Hi Toby
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think we should implement Canonical XML and XML Signature on top of
dom4j
> by ourself.
Agreed. Especially Canonical XML.
> Tell me what you think about this and then I starting with
> implementation tomorrow
Go for it. Maybe try implementing an CanonicalXMLFilter that operates as a
SAX XMLFilter, then it could work with the existing SAXReader.
> Could become high traffic on this list now ;-)
:-)
> By the way, german "Java Magazin" mention dom4j in a short news paragraph.
> They emphasise the XPath, DOM and SAX support. They wrote that dom4j is
> avaiblabe in Version 0.3 ;-) but they couldn't know how fast dom4j
advance.
Cool.
James
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
dom4j-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dom4j-dev
