James M Woods wrote: > We are still evaluating what will be done with unclaimed proceeds, > since this will not take effect until a year from the commencement of > auctions we want to evaluate the claim that former registrants will not > be part of the equation when a domain is sold at auction.
I'm not sure I understand this sentence, and I'd like to get a clear answer. Let us say that the registrant changes his e-mail address, postal address, and telephone number three months after registering a domain name, and is therefore unreachable at the time that renewal notices are sent. Assuming the reseller participates in the auction system, can this registrant's domain name be auctioned (even though the registrant does not give explicit consent to it at the time his domain name expires)? Or will his domain name not be included in the auction at all because he didn't give explicit consent at that time? In the first case, of course, there would be a larger amount of undeliverable money than in the second case. I was having an offlist discussion with another reseller who said that as he understood it, a domain name won't be auctionable unless the registrant gives explicit consent at the expiration time, but as I understood the system, domain names will be eligible for inclusion (assuming the reseller participates) even if the registrant is unreachable. This point is very vague in the description of the service. Can you confirm which is correct? Thanks! -- Robert L Mathews, Tiger Technologies http://www.tigertech.net/ _______________________________________________ domains-gen mailing list [email protected] http://discuss.tucows.com/mailman/listinfo/domains-gen
