Hi Jim,

   This is the very problem that a local start-up company that I worked at
has solved! I was part of the design team and things worked amazingly well.
We even stressed the system by making sure the audio did not drop of get
messed up when the microwave oven was running. And we did this without any
compression, just straight sample and send of the audio data. They are the
actual chip company, but their website will direct you to products that use
their chips including products that you can by at Best Buy...and think you
will be supporting a local Oregon company!!! As for the quality the systems
that I worked on even supported sample rates up to 192KHz, for those
hardcore audiophiles!!!

    So check out:   https://www.avnera.com/

Regards,


Manny

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Jim Larson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Does anyone have any experience (good or bad) with wireless audio links?
> I'd like something that will provide high quality, uncompressed stereo
> (mono will work, but I doubt if it's an option). To me, that means 16 bit,
> 44Khz sort of data. (Is this I2S?). Transmission distance of 30 to 100 feet
> is desired. Low power consumption is always desired.
>
> Systems I've looked at are Bluetooth Audio (not sure if it meets my specs)
> or PurePath (looks good, but is TI proprietary). Are there others? Any
> experience with these? Random thoughts?
>
> Thanks for any input! Obviously, I don't know a lot about this field.
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> dorkbotpdx-blabber mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/dorkbotpdx-blabber
>
_______________________________________________
dorkbotpdx-blabber mailing list
[email protected]
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/dorkbotpdx-blabber

Reply via email to