That's very encouraging news Clive, thanks for the update. On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 14:39, CA Wills <ci...@cewland.uk> wrote:
> Hi All on DLUG Meeting. > > Thanks to you it appears Hugh is correct and today Tsohost have > corrected the MX server. > At the moment my cinfo email is working but the others are not - yet. > Nead to check tomorrow that the changes to MX have filtered thro' the > system. > Replying to Peters email below which has just appeared as I was updating > the Thunderbird emails on the desktop, so hope this gets out. > Many thanks Hugh and others for your help. > > On 08/06/2023 13:05, Peter Merchant wrote: > > I printed it off, but never got it to Clive before the meeting. It's > > now being recycled through the printer. > > Peter > > On 08/06/2023 10:13, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > >> Hi Hugh, > >> > >>> 2. Clive's provider has not updated the MX record for his domain to > >>> point > >>> to the new server, so the mail still goes to the old server. > >> That tallies with my off-list email to Peter yesterday, CC'd Clive. > >> I was pointing out this list had suspended Clive's subscription because > >> of bounces. Each bounce was due to the MX host for the domain refusing > >> to accept the email because the LUG hadn't authenticated. In other > >> words, it was as if the MX record was misconfigured to be an SMTP > >> server that Clive should be using to send email rather than the incoming > >> SMTP server others should use to email Clive. > >> > >> As expected, the CC to Clive bounced. :-) > >> > >> I've never been clear who provides the email system which Clive is > >> using. If it's GoDaddy then, as I wrote to Peter yesterday, an Internet > >> search found > >> https://uk.godaddy.com/help/check-and-manage-my-mx-records-7590 which > >> suggests the two DNS MX RRs should be > >> > >> 0 smtp.secureserver.net > >> 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net > >> > >> This page gives IMAP and outgoing SMTP server configuration. > >> > https://uk.godaddy.com/help/server-and-port-settings-for-workspace-email-6949 > >> > >> > >> swaks(1) can be useful to give command-line SMTP email tests for someone > >> else to run and feedback the result. Similarly fetchmail(1) for POP3 or > >> IMAP. > >> > > > > > -- > Next meeting: Online, Jitsi, Tuesday, 2023-07-04 20:00 > Check to whom you are replying > Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk > New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk > -- Next meeting: Online, Jitsi, Tuesday, 2023-07-04 20:00 Check to whom you are replying Meetings, mailing list, IRC, ... http://dorset.lug.org.uk New thread, don't hijack: mailto:dorset@mailman.lug.org.uk
