You can use VS.NET's IDE to debug the native code parts of the SSCLI.
The document
file://c:/sscli/docs/debugging/debugging_overview.html#DebuggingUnmanage
dSSCLICodeonWindows explains how to do it.

It isn't practical to build the SSCLI from within VS.NET:  the SSCLI
build process is very complex and it will be difficult to replicate all
of the special tools, command-line arguments, and dependency
information.

Here is a hint if you are only making changes in clr\src\vm and want to
rebuild more quickly than waiting for buildall...

        cd /d %CORBASE%\src\vm
        build                           <- this builds
%CORBASE%\bin\rotor_x86\...\cee_wks.lib
        cd /d %CORBASE%\src\dlls\mscoree
        build   -z                      <- this links cee_wks.lib and
other libs to build sscoree.dll

Barry

-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion of the Rotor Shared Source CLI implementation
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Hurlbut
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 6:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET-ROTOR] FW: Using Visusal Studio to build Rotor

Sajay,

If you can get it to work, that would be great info to mention.  I am
used
to the command line, mainly because I work with Rotor in FreeBSD where
there is no VS.NET ide -).

Let us know your results if you try it.

Thanks,

Robert Hurlbut
http://weblogs.asp.net/rhurlbut

On Fri, 28 May 2004 16:52:11 +0400, Sajay Antony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>Thank you for the response.
>
>The thing I noted was that rotor builds with vs environment setup. With
>reference to the VM part.So I believe the c++ compiler is used I would
like
>to know why is the vs.net environment setup necessary if otherwise.
This
is
>my understanding do correct me if im wrong.
>
>Also debuggin can be started with devenv again with the IDE and the
code
>breaks and then we can debug with the IDE.
>
>So out of all this dependency with visual studio I believe we should be
able
>to atleast build the vm part of rotor done in c++ using the IDE .
>
>I do not know if I have misunderstood anything.  I agree building the
C#
>bcls would be a difference story but the CLR part should build as its
in
C++
>and asm. Am I wrong in thinking so.
>
>Thank you for you time.
>
>Regards
>Sajay

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r)  http://www.develop.com
ASP.NET courses you may be interested in:

Guerrilla ASP.NET
15 March 2004, in Boston, MA
17 May 2004 in Torrance, CA
7 June 2004, London, UK

http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentorŪ  http://www.develop.com
ASP.NET courses you may be interested in:

Guerrilla ASP.NET
15 March 2004, in Boston, MA
17 May 2004 in Torrance, CA
7 June 2004, London, UK

http://www.develop.com/courses/gaspdotnetls

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com

Reply via email to