I thought I would make a comment on the GXA alignment. My educated guess is that most of the initial GXA specs were derived from work done on HailStorm. For example, way before SOAP-RP (WS-Routing) saw the light of day, HailStorm had pretty much the exact same headers if you look through the old SDKs and whitepapers...
-----Original Message----- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sam Gentile Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:32 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Hailstorm is dead >From my web log: The company where I work, works very closely with Lucovsky's HailStorm group. It was my understanding, that they grew to realize that they had not succeeded well initially with HailStorm because of some proprietary approaches and not based on standards. They re-organized around the GXA effort, which is a good thing. They also realized, based on feedback from people like us, that what they initially gave us was far from capable to develop real, production Web Services. To get there, Web Services need Security, Routing, Inspection, Robustness, etc. Thus GXA. And as far as I understand it, this is being done with IBM and is totally based on Industry standards. So when Lucovsky says "Web Services have a way to go" he is just speaking the truth. Sam Gentile Co-Author Wrox Professional Visual C++.NET (ISBN 1861005962 ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.project-inspiration.com/sgentile http://www.project-inspiration.com/sgentile/DotNet.htm BLOG: http://radio.weblogs.com/0105852/ http://www.project-inspiration.com/sgentile/ScienceFiction.htm -----Original Message----- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Philo Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Hailstorm is dead Interesting after-action analysis, but I didn't see a mention of the #1 complaint I saw about .Net My Services: It cost too damn much. Philo > -----Original Message----- > From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Chris Anderson > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Hailstorm is dead > > > > Somebody summarize--it's a members-only link. > > > It's free to join, but here's the content: > > > Microsoft Has Shelved Its Internet 'Persona' Service > > By JOHN MARKOFF > > AN FRANCISCO, April 10 - Microsoft (news/quote) has quietly shelved a > consumer information service that was once planned as the > centerpiece of the > company's foray into the market for tightly linked Web services. > You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
