Agreed.  Sidebar gadgets are just html pages running in an instance of IE.
It really should be easy to port the existing search.htm to work in the
sidebar.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie Russel
> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:46 PM
> To: DQSD development discussions
> Subject: Re: [DQSD-Devel] lipsum partially broken
> 
> That same JavaScript should be callable from a Vista Gadget, _if_ I
> understand how they work. But keep in mind, IANAD.
> 
> Charlie.
> http://msmvps.com/xperts64
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/charlie.russel
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-devel-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman
> > Sent: September-20-07 1:13 PM
> > To: DQSD development discussions
> > Subject: Re: [DQSD-Devel] lipsum partially broken
> >
> > Charlie, Glenn,
> >
> > The problem/strength of DQSD is that it consumes active content --
> > every search contains JavaScript.
> >
> > I think getting a new DQSD to consume the existing searches would
> be
> > pretty hard. But I'm not sure, maybe it's not so bad.
> >
> > I'll think about it...
> >
> > - Kim
> >
> > On 9/20/07, Charlie Russel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I agree, this would be a perfect Vista Gadget. And should be able
> to
> > > consume the same or very similar search files.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-
> devel-
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn Carr
> > > > Sent: September-20-07 12:07 PM
> > > > To: 'DQSD development discussions'
> > > > Subject: Re: [DQSD-Devel] lipsum partially broken
> > > >
> > > > Kim wrote:
> > > > > Oh well, I'm beginning to wonder whether DQSD can actually
> survive
> > > > > much longer what with all the platform "improvements".
> > > >
> > > > Yup.  I'm not running Vista anywhere, but I think DQSD's
> lifetime, in
> > > its
> > > > current state, is limited.  I _do_ think that a Vista gadget
> with the
> > > same
> > > > type of extensibility would be very nice.
> > > >
> > > > I'm convinced someone with enough time, energy, motivation, and
> > > know-how
> > > > could probably come up with a nice Vista gadget similar to
> DQSD,
> > > possibly
> > > > even consuming the same search files, or at least of port of
> those
> > > search
> > > > files.
> > > >
> > > > Time, energy, motivation, and know-how.  That's all that's
> required.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Archive: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dqsd-devel

Reply via email to