Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wade -
The Drake filters are generally fine, and if you can save some money
while getting GOOD Drake filters, they should cost about half of what
the Inrad filters cost. The vast majority of the Drake filters still
meet their specifications.
That said, the Inrads are better filters. They had the benefit of 25
years of technology improvement, and much more powerful computers,
resulting in smoother passband among other things.
Obviously they are also 25 years "younger", and crystals DO age over time.
73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA
Drake 2-B, 4-B & C-Line Service Supplement CDs
<www.k4oah.com>
wmacleod wrote:
Hello Drakelist:
Does anyone know how the INRAD selection of 5695 KHz 2^nd IF filters
for the R4C compare against the original Piezo Technology filters
offered by Drake? Would I be better off obtaining original Drake
filters or going with the INRADs.
regards
Wade
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page: www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------
