Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist gang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Byron -

The NBK board was required to use the wired-in 34-NB in the TR-3 and early TR-4 _ONLY_, the ones with the original "soupcan" filter. These filters required an output termination of 2200 ohms while the NB is 500 ohms. The 34-NB wired-in and the PNB-34 plug-in circuits are electrically identical.

The terminating resistors on T6 and T13 were also changed from 2.2k in soupcan filter units to 470 ohm, 5% in dual filter units. The dual filters were adopted around s/n 23000, but the schematic was not changed to reflect the R16 and R77 value changes until Version 3 in January 1967.

73, Garey - K4OAH
Glen Allen, VA

Drake 2-B, 4-B & C-Line Service Supplement CDs
<www.k4oah.com>



Byron Tatum wrote:
Hello-
    Maybe someone here may be able to answer this question:
Why did the 34-NB noise blanker require the NBK matching board (had torroid matching into crystal filters, torroid matching into 6EA8 mixer) ? I have studied the 9-NB board ( PC board for 34-NB noise blanker) and compared it to the 34-PNB PC board. I really cannot see any electrical difference with a casual glance between these two noise blanker boards. On radios that had the socket for 34-PNB there were no matching torroids installed. Perhaps I need to study closely the torroids on boards for differences, I would assume the 34-PNB board did not need external matching torroids because it performed matching on board? Who might have in-depth technical info on these boards beyond the used manuals, brochures, etc? Thanks, Byron WA5THJ.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Submissions:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to