WaHoo !
That was it, C159 was way leaky, and my version does not have R142, so that
added some confusion.

S-meter's working great and receiver's hotter than I can recall in recent
memory !

As always, thanks Garey,

   Chuck, K1OM

On Feb 16, 2008 11:13 AM, Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made an utterance to the drakelist
> gang
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Chuck -
>
> I was just typing my last as you were sending yours...    Great minds,
> etc.    :-)
>
> Nothing like having the right schematic.....  C159 is a 0.01 disc
> ceramic in this version.
>
> R142 likely has gone way up in value or cracked.  Not in the earlier
> schematic I was looking at.
>
> Schematic in separate message off reflector.
>
> 73, Garey - K4OAH
> Glen Allen, VA
>
> Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line & TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
> <www.k4oah.com>
>
>
>
> Chuck Grandgent wrote:
> > C159 was definitely bad Garey, replaced that and now I have S-meter
> > action.
> > However I still have no plate voltage on V5, and for the life of me I
> > can't see how it's wired for it.  It seems to have a 22k resistor
> > across T10 on the V5 plate side, and other than that and the
> > connection to C159, I don't see how it gets to any voltage, it's like
> > R142 is missing.
> >
> > My serial number is 6987.
> >
> >    Chuck, K1OM
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2008 11:30 PM, Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >     made an utterance to the drakelist gang
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     Chuck -
> >
> >     C159 may be very leaky or shorted.   0.1 uF at 200V.  You may have a
> >     fault in T10.  B+ is applied to V5 through the primary of T10 and
> one
> >     end of the secondary is at ground.  Check DC voltages on either
> >     side of
> >     T10.  A plate-suppressor grid short in V5 could have smoked T10,
> >     so use
> >     a known good tube.
> >
> >     The 6HS6 filament is just a filament wiring anomaly.   According
> >     to s/n
> >     4054 schematic Pin 4 should be 6.3 and Pin 3 should be 0.  What is
> the
> >     s/n of your R-4A?  I have the correct schematic.
> >
> >     73, Garey - K4OAH
> >     Glen Allen, VA
> >
> >     Drake 2-B, 4-B, C-Line & TR-4/C Service Supplement CDs
> >     <www.k4oah.com <http://www.k4oah.com>>
> >
> >
> >
> >     Chuck Grandgent wrote:
> >     > The plot thickens.
> >     > I checked resistance and voltage at all the pins for V2, V3, V4,
> V5.
> >     > The two bads are:
> >     >   1) V5 12BA6 pin 5 (plate), resistance is 150 ohms, s/b 10k.  And
> >     > votage is 3 volts, s/b 110v
> >     > I guess R41 and maybe R142 bear more checking, though if either of
> >     > these went high, I can't account for the low plate to ground
> >     > resistance through this fault.
> >     > Swapped this tube also with no effect.
> >     >
> >     >   2) V2 6HS6, manual says pin 3 (filament) s/b 6.3, is zero and
> >     pin 4
> >     > (filament) s/b 12.6, is 6.4.  Looking at the schematic, not sure
> >     what
> >     > to make of that.  And actually I did swap between my two 6HS6's
> with
> >     > no difference.
> >     >
> >     >    Chuck, K1OM
> >     >
> >     > On Feb 10, 2008 6:54 PM, Chuck Grandgent
> >     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> >     >
> >     >     OK, got some time to spend on this today.
> >     >     R40, R41, R42, and R89 SEEMED to checkout OK.
> >     >     However, if I put a potentiometer across R41 and adjust it for
> a
> >     >     low value, I can get the S-meter to respond.  Then, the
> S-meter
> >     >     zero adjustment R42 can bring the S-meter to any level on
> >     the meter.
> >     >     But, it seems totally non-responsive to any received signal.
> >     >
> >     >     I was also able to adjust the receiver sensitivity
> potentiometer
> >     >     on the bottom so TP2 was minus 1.35 volts.
> >     >
> >     >     I replaced V4, V5, and V3, with no discernable difference.  I
> >     >     didn't have a spare for V2 6HS6.
> >     >
> >     >     What to check now ?
> >     >
> >     >     Thanks,   Chuck, K1OM
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     On Feb 6, 2008 5:12 PM, Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
> >     wrote:
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >         Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     >         <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> made an utterance to the
> >     >         drakelist gang
> >     >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     >         Chuck -
> >     >
> >     >         OK.  That's good!
> >     >
> >     >          From your description, the AVC circuitry is working...
> >     >
> >     >         I don't have a good photo, but I bet three of the four
> >     >         components are on
> >     >         the board with the S-Meter Sensitivity pot, next to the
> >     >         crystal.  R40
> >     >         (1k Trim), R41 (820), R89 (560) and associated
> >     connections.  A
> >     >         series of
> >     >         ohmmeter checks should find it.  I'm betting R40 is
> >     open, or a
> >     >         broken
> >     >         wire/connection.  :-)
> >     >
> >     >         73, Garey - K4OAH
> >     >         Glen Allen, VA
> >     >
> >     >         Drake 2-B, 4-B & C-Line Service Supplement CDs
> >     >         <www.k4oah.com <http://www.k4oah.com>
> >     <http://www.k4oah.com>>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >         Chuck Grandgent wrote:
> >     >         > Thanks Garey,
> >     >         >
> >     >         > well the meter seems OK, the DMM on lowest resistance
> >     range
> >     >         causes it
> >     >         > to deflect a tad.  I had to repair the AVC switch at one
> >     >         point, I
> >     >         > guess I should check there, among other places.
> >     >         >
> >     >         >    Chuck, K1OM
> >     >         >
> >     >         > On Feb 6, 2008 4:20 PM, Garey Barrell
> >     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     >         <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >     >         > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>>
> >     >         wrote:
> >     >         >
> >     >         >
> >     >         >     Garey Barrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     >         <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >     >         <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>>
> >     >         >     made an utterance to the drakelist gang
> >     >         >
> >     >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     >         >     Chuck -
> >     >         >
> >     >         >     The S-Meter is a simple bridge circuit that
> >     compares the
> >     >         plate current
> >     >         >     of V2 and V3 with the plate current of V4 and V5.
> >      There
> >     >         are only two
> >     >         >     resistors and two trim-pots!  Since the radio seems
> to
> >     >         be working more
> >     >         >     or less normally, those tubes are probably "good
> >     >         enough".  If the
> >     >         >     meter
> >     >         >     needle is just sitting there on the mechanical zero
> >     >         point, it's most
> >     >         >     likely an "open" in that circuitry.  Just as a
> guess,
> >     >         I'd first check
> >     >         >     the meter terminal connections, then wonder about
> the
> >     >         S-Meter
> >     >         >     Sensitivity pot, but it could be a bad connection or
> >     >         (YIKES!) an open
> >     >         >     meter movement.  The movement itself is 3 mA, as
> >     are ALL
> >     >         the R-4/T-4
> >     >         >     meters, so can be checked with a DMM for continuity.
> >     >          Don't try to
> >     >         >     use a
> >     >         >     VOM, as they put too much current through the
> ohmmeter
> >     >         circuit.
> >     >         >
> >     >         >     73, Garey - K4OAH
> >     >         >     Glen Allen, VA
> >     >         >
> >     >         >     Drake 2-B, 4-B & C-Line Service Supplement CDs
> >     >         >     <www.k4oah.com <http://www.k4oah.com>
> >     <http://www.k4oah.com>
> >     >         <http://www.k4oah.com>>
> >     >         >
> >     >         >
> >     >         >
> >     >         >     Chuck Grandgent wrote:
> >     >         >     > R4A, S-meter was working OK, just noticed it is
> not
> >     >         right now, don't
> >     >         >     > know for quite how long.
> >     >         >     >
> >     >         >     > AVC is working, as evidenced by turning RF gain
> all
> >     >         the way down and
> >     >         >     > then back up, AVC slow takes very noticeably
> longer
> >     >         for the RF
> >     >         >     leve to
> >     >         >     > return once I turn up RF gain, compared to AVC
> fast.
> >     >         >     >
> >     >         >     > Adjusting R40 and R42 for S-meter and balance have
> >     >         zero effect,
> >     >         >     > S-meter is all the way to the left.
> >     >         >     >
> >     >         >     > Things to try ?
> >     >         >     >
> >     >         >     > Tnx, Chuck, K1OM
> >     >         >     >
> >     >         >
> >     >         >
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Submissions:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unsubscribe drakelist in body
> Hopelessly Lost:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] - help in body of message
> Zerobeat Web Page:  www.zerobeat.net - sponsored by www.tlchost.net
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>

Reply via email to