You can send it by adding email addresses to git send-email with the "--to [email protected]" argument. If it doesn't come up on patchwork the second try don't worry about it, I'll look and see if I can workaround it. TBH I'm not entirely sure why it didn't show up in the first place
On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 02:38 +0800, 蒋健 wrote: > I need resubmit a new patch, how can i make sure dri-devel@ is > explicitly？I got to:list by the script > name of get_maintainer.pl. > Pls help me… > > > 发自我的企业微信 > > ----------Reply to Message---------- > On Wed,Jun 22,2022 2:07 AM Lyude Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually I hate to ask but could you resend this and the other patch that yo > u > sent and make sure that dri-devel@ is explicitly in the to: list? For some > reason these patches don't seem to be coming up on patchwork > > On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 13:54 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> > > > > Will push to the appropriate branch in a moment > > > > On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 21:14 +0800, Jiang Jian wrote: > > > there is an unexpected word "the" in the comments that need to be droppe > d > > > > > > file: drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > line: 1600 > > > * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > > changed to > > > * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > index e7c22c2ca90c..499f75768523 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static int drm_dp_aux_reply_duration(const struct > > > drm_dp_aux_msg *msg) > > > * Calculate the length of the i2c transfer in usec, assuming > > > * the i2c bus speed is as specified. Gives the the "worst" > > > * case estimate, ie. successful while as long as possible. > > > - * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > > + * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > > * message includes a START, ADDRESS and STOP. Neither does it > > > * account for additional random variables such as clock stretching. > > > */ > > > > -- > Cheers, > Lyude Paul (she/her) > Software Engineer at Red Hat > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat
