Yeah I'm not totally sure what's going on here, I wouldn't worry about it too much. I will just push the patches manually
On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 03:01 +0800, 蒋健 wrote: > I got the list as follow: > ~/linux-kernel/linux-next on master ⇡1 ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl > 0001-drm-display-Remove-duplicate-the-in-two-places.patch > David Airlie <[email protected]> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) > Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) > Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > (commit_signer:8/21=38%,authored:5/21=24%) > Lyude Paul <[email protected]> (commit_signer:7/21=33%,authored:2/21=10%) > Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> > (commit_signer:5/21=24%,authored:5/21=24%) > Douglas Anderson <[email protected]> > (commit_signer:5/21=24%,authored:3/21=14%) > "Ville Syrjälä" <[email protected]> (commit_signer:5/21=24%) > Imre Deak <[email protected]> (authored:2/21=10%) > [email protected] (open list:DRM DRIVERS) > [email protected] (open list) > > Submit patch CMD as follow: > "git send-email 0001-drm-display-Remove-duplicate-the-in-two-places.patch -- > to [email protected],[email protected] --cc > [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],dianders@chromium > .org,[email protected],[email protected],dri- > [email protected],[email protected] " > > > ------------------ Original ------------------ > From: "蒋健"<[email protected]>; > Date: Wed, Jun 22, 2022 02:47 AM > To: "Lyude Paul"<[email protected]>; "airlied"<[email protected]>; > "daniel"<[email protected]>; > Cc: "jani.nikula"<[email protected]>; > "ville.syrjala"<[email protected]>; > "tzimmermann"<[email protected]>; "dianders"<[email protected]>; > "imre.deak"<[email protected]>; "dri-devel"<dri- > [email protected]>; > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/display: drop unexpected word "the" in the > comments > > Okay,I will submit a new patch immediately. > > > 发自我的企业微信 > > ----------Reply to Message---------- > On Wed,Jun 22,2022 2:41 AM Lyude Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > You can send it by adding email addresses to git send-email with the "--to > [email protected]" argument. If it doesn't come up on patchwork the second try > don't worry about it, I'll look and see if I can workaround it. TBH I'm not > entirely sure why it didn't show up in the first place > > On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 02:38 +0800, 蒋健 wrote: > > I need resubmit a new patch, how can i make sure dri-devel@ is > > explicitly？I got to:list by the script > > name of get_maintainer.pl. > > Pls help me… > > > > > > 发自我的企业微信 > > > > ----------Reply to Message---------- > > On Wed,Jun 22,2022 2:07 AM Lyude Paul <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually I hate to ask but could you resend this and the other patch that > > you > > sent and make sure that dri-devel@ is explicitly in the to: list? For some > > reason these patches don't seem to be coming up on patchwork > > > > On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 13:54 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> > > > > > > Will push to the appropriate branch in a moment > > > > > > On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 21:14 +0800, Jiang Jian wrote: > > > > there is an unexpected word "the" in the comments that need to be > > dropped > > > > > > > > file: drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > > line: 1600 > > > > * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > > > changed to > > > > * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > > index e7c22c2ca90c..499f75768523 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.c > > > > @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static int drm_dp_aux_reply_duration(const > > struct > > > > drm_dp_aux_msg *msg) > > > > * Calculate the length of the i2c transfer in usec, assuming > > > > * the i2c bus speed is as specified. Gives the the "worst" > > > > * case estimate, ie. successful while as long as possible. > > > > - * Doesn't account the the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > > > + * Doesn't account the "MOT" bit, and instead assumes each > > > > * message includes a START, ADDRESS and STOP. Neither does it > > > > * account for additional random variables such as clock stretching. > > > > */ > > > > > -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat
