On 5/9/25 2:37 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 5/8/25 8:25 PM, Connor Abbott wrote: >> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 2:14 PM Konrad Dybcio <konradyb...@kernel.org> wrote: >>> >>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dyb...@oss.qualcomm.com> >>> >>> This bit is set iff the UBWC version is 1.0. That notably does not >>> include QCM2290's "no UBWC". >> >> While this is technically true, AFAIK the only difference between UBWC >> 1.0 and 2.0 is that newer UBWC disables level 1 bank swizzling, which >> is why I originally wrote it this way. There's a bit of redundancy >> between the UBWC version and ubwc_swizzle bit 0. > > It turns out to be a hardware matter
Well you just said that.. in any case, i can do either (or both with a sanity check) Konrad
