On 5/8/25 9:26 PM, Connor Abbott wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 2:14 PM Konrad Dybcio <konradyb...@kernel.org> wrote: >> >> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dyb...@oss.qualcomm.com> >> >> On A663 (SA8775P) the value matches exactly. >> >> On A610, the value matches on SM6115, but is different on SM6125. That >> turns out not to be a problem, as the bits that differ aren't even >> interpreted. > > This is definitely going to break userspace, because the kernel > doesn't expose the UBWC version, instead exposing just the swizzle and > userspace expects that it sets the right value for older UBWC versions > before it became configurable (0x7 for UBWC 1.0 and 0x6 for 2.0-3.0). > It looks like the data for SM6125 is just wrong.
Oh that's sad.. I'll drop this commit Konrad
