On 5/14/25 10:32 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 05:10:32PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dyb...@oss.qualcomm.com> >> >> On A663 (SA8775P) the value matches exactly. >> >> On A610, the value matches on SM6115, but is different on SM6125. That >> turns out not to be a problem, as the bits that differ aren't even >> interpreted. > > We also don't set swizzle for a lot of UBWC 1.0 targets (as MDSS wasn't > programming those). Should we fix all of them to use 6 by default? Or 7?
I don't think any default value is a good idea - this is the sort of programming error you track down 4 years after you go bald looking for it Konrad
