On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 01:21:01PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin via B4 Relay wrote: > From: Xiangxu Yin <[email protected]> > > SM6150 uses the same DisplayPort controller as SM8150, which is already > compatible with SM8350. Add the SM6150-specific compatible string and > update the binding example accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <[email protected]> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml | 10 > ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml > index > 9ac24f99d3ada1c197c9654dc9babebccae972ed..ba0dea2edea98cee0826cf38b3f33361666e004a > 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml > @@ -51,6 +51,16 @@ patternProperties: > compatible: > const: qcom,sm6150-dpu > > + "^displayport-controller@[0-9a-f]+$": > + type: object > + additionalProperties: true > + properties: > + compatible: > + items: > + - const: qcom,sm6150-dp > + - const: qcom,sm8150-dp
Perhaps I'm missing something, but if sm6150-dp is the same controller as sm8150-dp, which is the same controller as sm8350-dp...doesn't that imply that sm6150-dp is the same as sm8350-dp and we could not mention the sm8150-dp here? Regards, Bjorn > + - const: qcom,sm8350-dp > + > "^dsi@[0-9a-f]+$": > type: object > additionalProperties: true > > -- > 2.34.1 > >
