On 11/4/25 1:36 PM, Matt Coster wrote:
Hello Matt,
@@ -105,6 +109,7 @@ allOf:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
+ - img,img-ge7800
- img,img-gx6250
Can you put these in the same order they're declared above? The way I
read it, the order is img,xxx in generational order followed by
soc-specific entries in alphabetical order (which is why we have
img,img-gx6250 before img,img-bxs-4-64 below).
In this enum, the entries are (should be) sorted alphabetically .
Do you want to sort them generationally instead ?
If we have it wrong and the correct way is that these should always be
alphabetical, can you please fix up the existing enum below (with gx6250
before bxs-4-64) to match the constraint too?
Fixed in V2, thanks !
