"Danilo Krummrich" <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed Feb 4, 2026 at 12:56 PM CET, Andreas Hindborg wrote: >> From: Asahi Lina <[email protected]> >> >> By analogy to `AlwaysRefCounted` and `ARef`, an `Ownable` type is a >> (typically C FFI) type that *may* be owned by Rust, but need not be. Unlike >> `AlwaysRefCounted`, this mechanism expects the reference to be unique >> within Rust, and does not allow cloning. >> >> Conceptually, this is similar to a `KBox<T>`, except that it delegates >> resource management to the `T` instead of using a generic allocator. >> >> This change is a derived work based on work by Asahi Lina >> <[email protected]> [1] and Oliver Mangold <[email protected]>. >> >> Link: >> https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/ >> [1] >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]> > > Given the From: line above, this needs Lina's SoB. > > This patch was also originally posted by Abdiel and Boqun and I think we > should > account for this. I mentioned this in a couple of previous versions already, > e.g. in [1]. I think we should account for this. > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
I had a question about this in the cover letter. It is my understanding that the SoB needs confirmation from the author if the code was changed. I changed the code and did not want to bother the original author, because it is my understanding they do not wish to be contacted. I did not want to misrepresent the original author, and so I did not change the "From:" line. I want to be clear that I want to submit this patch the correct way, whatever that is. I will happily take all the guidance I can get to find the correct way to represent the work of the original author(s). How would you prefer to account for the work by Abdiel and Boqun? Please advise about SoB and I will correct the series. Best regards, Andreas Hindborg
