On Wed Feb 4, 2026 at 4:06 PM GMT, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> "Danilo Krummrich" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> On Wed Feb 4, 2026 at 12:56 PM CET, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>> From: Asahi Lina <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> By analogy to `AlwaysRefCounted` and `ARef`, an `Ownable` type is a
>>> (typically C FFI) type that *may* be owned by Rust, but need not be. Unlike
>>> `AlwaysRefCounted`, this mechanism expects the reference to be unique
>>> within Rust, and does not allow cloning.
>>>
>>> Conceptually, this is similar to a `KBox<T>`, except that it delegates
>>> resource management to the `T` instead of using a generic allocator.
>>>
>>> This change is a derived work based on work by Asahi Lina
>>> <[email protected]> [1] and Oliver Mangold <[email protected]>.
>>>
>>> Link: 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/
>>>  [1]
>>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <[email protected]>
>>
>> Given the From: line above, this needs Lina's SoB.
>>
>> This patch was also originally posted by Abdiel and Boqun and I think we 
>> should
>> account for this. I mentioned this in a couple of previous versions already,
>> e.g. in [1]. I think we should account for this.
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
> I had a question about this in the cover letter.
>
> It is my understanding that the SoB needs confirmation from the author
> if the code was changed. I changed the code and did not want to bother
> the original author, because it is my understanding they do not wish to
> be contacted. I did not want to misrepresent the original author, and so
> I did not change the "From:" line.

Looks like your didn't make a very substantial change (just OwnableMut ->
Unpin)? So mentioning the change in commit message should be sufficient.

If it's very substantial I would change author to be you and add the original
author as Co-developed-by instead.

Best,
Gary

>
> I want to be clear that I want to submit this patch the correct way,
> whatever that is. I will happily take all the guidance I can get to find
> the correct way to represent the work of the original author(s).
>
> How would you prefer to account for the work by Abdiel and Boqun?
>
> Please advise about SoB and I will correct the series.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Andreas Hindborg

Reply via email to