Hello, Tvrtko. On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 10:38:45AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > +/* Avoid naming clash with the other cpumask */ > +static struct device_attribute dev_attr_unbound_cpumask = > + __ATTR(cpumask, 0644, unbound_cpumask_show, unbound_cpumask_store);
Can this be DEVICE_ATTR_RW_NAMED() instead?
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW_NAMED(unbound_cpumask, "cpumask");
It expands to the same dev_attr_unbound_cpumask with the same file name
and handlers, and the comment can go.
Thanks.
--
tejun
