On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:16:49PM -0700, Mark Allan wrote: [..snip..] > The important thing is to have drivers available from a source you have > some confidence in. If Linus wrote a binary-only kernel module that > provided some functionality you require, would you have faith in it? > Binary only support is usually favorable to no support at all. Security is not a matter of trust or confidence. Either you have the code to audit or you don't, there's nothing subtle about it. -- Guido _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Gareth Hughes
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree... Andrew James Richardson
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Gareth Hughes
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree... Michel Dänzer
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Manuel Teira
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Leif Delgass
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree... Manuel Teira
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Mark Allan
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Mark Allan
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree... Guido Guenther
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Will Newton
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Adam K Kirchhoff
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Will Newton
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree... Adam K Kirchhoff
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Upd... Mark Allan
- Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree... Will Newton
- [Dri-devel] Re[3]: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree?... Nerijus Baliunas