> The .o shouldn't be packaged, or even built. I'll have to check why this > is happening. Well, hope the next version will be free of these wrong object files.
> Could you please past the output of insmod to see what are the failed > symbols? Well, now it is OK. Sorry for disturbing on this issue. For some reason, it took the old version of mach64.o (bundled with tarball). Now I really rebuilt it - and still no success in point 2. The module loaded without problems. > > 2. Well, I run updated X but glxinfo shows there is no DR - and the > > driver is usual mesa:( Ldd informs me about correct libGL and libGLU > > used for glxinfo. Any ideas? In X log, I do not see any errors reports > > - it seems DRI is loaded as necessary.... So, still same situation... No DR, just "Indirect Mesa". Can it be the problem of XFree 4.2.0 based on old Mesa? > Well, first let's try to figure out the first problem as this second one > could be a side effect. No, it is not... Any other ideas? Cheers, Sergey _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
