On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 10:43:35AM -0700, Allen Akin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:12:33PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> | 
> | iirc, there's a bug in tblend.cpp, when it does the
> | check, it doesn't increment ePix, aPix so some pixels aren't checked.
> 
> Yep, that's definitely a bug.  Why haven't I heard a bug report before
> now? :-)

Yeah, sorry the short answer is I'd forgotten about making the
change until this thread appeared :-)

The longer answer is I found it trying to remove the return in the
verbose output so it'd report every failing pixel not just the first
(every blend test, and some others as well IIRC, are failing at row 13
column 0 on the radeon which seemed an odd occurance). 

That quickly found that bug, but the results from the radeon driver were
then bizarre, the first pixel error at row 13 col 0, then every
subsequent odd row being reported as wrong, but the even rows being
correct.

-- 
Michael.

_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to