--- Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 12:35 -0700, Jon Smirl wrote:
> > 
> > 2) copy of the user space code from XFree86 into a standalone library
> - now you
> > have to be root to play with the chip.
> > 3) Add a couple of IOCTLs to DRM to support modes/cursors. Do as much
> of the
> > work as possible in user space and just pass final register values to
> the
> > IOCTLs.
> > 
> > I would like to see #3. I have implemented #3 locally for the radeon
> but there
> > is no acceptance for adding it to main DRM drivers.
> 
> Of course, you neglect to mention the reasons for that. For one, you
The reasons for that?
I don't think I understand what reasons your talking about.

> haven't presented an interface yet that you have shown to remove the
The inerface would be card specific, all cards set modes diffrently.

> need to be root and a significant amount of code from the kernel at the
X runes as root and dose all the mode setting!!  

> same time. Obviously, immature solutions can't go into the DRM trunk and
Like I said some cards may need more kernel side then others, however I
think the library approch workes best.  Using a secure 0666 mode setting
devce with a std lib API is the best way to go.  Thought the kernel
interface is GOING to be card specific, some cards will requier a setuid
root(Xserver) to do the acctual mode switching.

> consequently the kernel because if they don't work out, they can become
maintenance nightmares: If the client code was going into XFree86 I'd
agree.  However it's not, it's going into a new project that currently
Isn't shiped by any one.

> maintenance nightmares. You have repeatedly been encouraged to develop a
> prototype system on branches or separate trees though. Don't wait for
Like I said, paches avalible.

> everyone else to drop everything else.
Lookes like a project that just needs some loving.  DirectFB might have
done better if it had some support as well.  Lookes like a case of 'Not
Made Here' syndrome.  Gatos was also effected by this, it had a working
DRI but was ignored for woking on the 'Made Here' DRI that was less
capable in the Xvideo respects.

> 
> 
> -- 
> Earthling Michel Dänzer      |     Debian (powerpc), X and DRI
> developer
> Libre software enthusiast    |   http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
> 


                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to