On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 11:32, Eric Anholt wrote: > As long as you don't use the linux-y > "u32"-type types, BSD should be happy with the changes.
can you explain why u32 would be outlawed? Surely it's trivial to do a typedef for u32 on BSD for drm ??
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
