> > can you explain why u32 would be outlawed? Surely it's trivial to do a > > typedef for u32 on BSD for drm ?? > > If there are nice standard types (uint32_t or u_int32_t, can't remember > which at the moment, I mentioned it in an email some time ago) out there > already that linux has too, why not use those? >
Lets get this bit of the discussion over with :-), the kernel has uint*_t in it in a few places, this is now a standard type so we will use it, if someone is going to work on the DRM they'll see the surrounding uint32_t so they'll know what it looks like and I'll make sure none of the others sneak in.... Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie pam_smb / Linux DECstation / Linux VAX / ILUG person ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
