On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 02:54, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 11:32, Eric Anholt wrote: > > As long as you don't use the linux-y > > "u32"-type types, BSD should be happy with the changes. > > can you explain why u32 would be outlawed? Surely it's trivial to do a > typedef for u32 on BSD for drm ??
If there are nice standard types (uint32_t or u_int32_t, can't remember which at the moment, I mentioned it in an email some time ago) out there already that linux has too, why not use those? -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
