On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:45:41 -0500 ty...@mit.edu wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:20:57PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Well the main thing was I wasn't mean to discuss possible legal issues > > and still don't have permission, you know as well as I do once lawyers are > > involved you have to keep out of things until they deal with them. > > The thing which really surprises me is that if there are legally > dubious issues, why on *earth* did Red Hat allow Fedora to ship said > code?
The thing which really surprises me is that if there are legal questions involved why on *earth* do people keep asking them on public mailing lists when they know the lawyers views/opinions/decisions will not be publishable there ? Ted, you of all people know that if you want to get an answer that isn't the way to get it. Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev -- _______________________________________________ Dri-devel mailing list Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
