On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:45:41 -0500
ty...@mit.edu wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:20:57PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > 
> > Well the main thing was I wasn't mean to discuss possible legal issues
> > and still don't have permission, you know as well as I do once lawyers are
> > involved you have to keep out of things until they deal with them.
> 
> The thing which really surprises me is that if there are legally
> dubious issues, why on *earth* did Red Hat allow Fedora to ship said
> code?

The thing which really surprises me is that if there are legal questions
involved why on *earth* do people keep asking them on public mailing
lists when they know the lawyers views/opinions/decisions will not be
publishable there ?

Ted, you of all people know that if you want to get an answer that isn't
the way to get it.

Alan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
--
_______________________________________________
Dri-devel mailing list
Dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to