On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Jay Pipes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sticking to the standard means very little to me, so -1 on this. If the > standard is reasonable and pertains to modern systems, sure, fine by me, > but I am not opposed to breaking standards, especially when they were > made by vendors 20 or more years ago and then bolted onto to fit needs. > > Standards are good for portability, but in this day and age, one has to > wonder what, realistically, is the likelihood of writing portable > applications to run on multiple RDBMS. Standard and portable SQL is a > complete myth IMHO, and applications which try to be portable suffer > from poor performance by aiming at lowest common denominators. > +1 Jeremy
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
