On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:01:37AM -0700, Brian Aker wrote: > INT(1) would be a 1 byte INT.
But why not 1 bit? or 1 digit in base 10? Many < 8 bit integers could be packed together by engines... possibly being very storage efficient for some applications. or why not INT(maxval) where INT(2**32) etc are accepted? -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
