Hi!
On Aug 12, 2008, at 12:55 AM, Roy Lyseng wrote:
If there is a standard, why not use it? Especially one that is so
comprehensive and consistent as the SQL standard (for most parts) :)
Raise it as an issue. If others want it I do not have an issue with
someone submitting a patch for it.
I will say thought that "CLOB" makes far less sense as a name then
"BLOB" or "TEXT". The vendors of the day tied themselves to names they
already had embedded in their products. I do not feel that beholden to
them.
If we could get field working without the row[] bits, I would be very
tempted to just have a "STRING" type with collation and chuck
everything else.
I am starting to wonder about INT and if it should not be
INTEGER(size) and just drop all the types for it as well.
Cheers,
-Brian
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
