On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Brian Aker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Aug 20, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Baron Schwartz wrote: > >>> If you use the storage engine to also commit DDL changes, commit handling >>> of >>> DDL is simplified. With separate DDL persistence, you need a kind of 2PC. >>> An > > > Drizzle uses, well will use completely when we are done, "discovery". The > engines are asked if they have a table, not any global cache/system. We will > have a default method (which will be something a bit more then what we have > today with FRM), but I expect most serious engines to handle this data on > their own.
And is the engine asked about the structure of the table, too? I hope so :-) I hope nothing outside the engine is telling the engine about itself. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
