Hi Brian, all,

> The implicit conversion is what allows "3" + 3 to work. I've always thought
> that was good... on the other hand it can not currently tell is "3 o'clock"
> + 4 is valid or not (IMHO it should not be).

I don't think it is possible to lay down any standard result. I could argue that

'3' + 3 == 6

just as well as

'3' + 3 == '33'

I don't see why either of these interpretations would be better than the other.

>
> Cheers,
>        -Brian
>
> --
> _______________________________________________________
> Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
> Seattle, Washington
> http://krow.net/                     <-- Me
> http://tangent.org/                <-- Software
> _______________________________________________________
> You can't grep a dead tree.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
> Post to     : [email protected]
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>



-- 
Roland Bouman
http://rpbouman.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to