Sheeri K. Cabral wrote:
On 10/11/08, *Jim Starkey* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
This does fly in the face of Brian's philosophy that database
systems should be smaller, dumber, and faster.
I think the implementation of UDTs and UDOs shouldn't bloat the code.
My understanding is there's so much crap in MySQL that using the
database in "small, fast, dumb" mode isn't small and fast. For me the
point of drizzle is "you can have bloat if you want it, but you're
creating that bloat, and it's yours alone and anyone else who decides
to install that bloat".....but you don't need to install that bloat if
you don't want to. :)
Think of how many thousands of MySQL users will just decide not to
install any auth plugin, since they all use SUPER users anyway..... :)
OK, just try and find someone (Microsoft employees excluded) who's in
favor of bloat?
If/when I implement user defined types, the type implementation will be
Java. I don't believe in loadable code that isn't constrained by a
sandbox, but that's a different issue.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
