John David Duncan wrote:
If you don't get rid of the "NEW" in NEWDATE and NEWDECIMAL now, they
will be there forever.
JD
I'd be glad to get rid of them. No sense with NEWanything, since all of
drizzle is NEW.
Group decision however ;)
On Oct 27, 2008, at 10:08 PM, Patrick Galbraith wrote:
Hi all,
I've unfortunately been super busy with other things going on in the
last month of so and have missed out on some changes. I'm working at
the moment on DBD::drizzle, and notice that it seems the types have
been consolidated (?) This is what I see now:
num enum_field_types { DRIZZLE_TYPE_TINY,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_LONG,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_DOUBLE,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_NULL, DRIZZLE_TYPE_TIMESTAMP,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_LONGLONG,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_TIME,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_DATETIME,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_NEWDATE, DRIZZLE_TYPE_VARCHAR,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_VIRTUAL,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_NEWDECIMAL,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_ENUM,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_BLOB,
DRIZZLE_TYPE_MAX=DRIZZLE_TYPE_BLOB
This is the extent of types, right?
Just double checking.
Thanks!
--Patrick
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
