Roy Lyseng wrote:
>
>
> Patrick Galbraith wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've unfortunately been super busy with other things going on in the
>> last month of so and have missed out on some changes. I'm working at
>> the moment on DBD::drizzle, and notice that it seems the types have
>> been consolidated (?) This is what I see now:
Blast. I really need to shift TIMESTAMP and VARCHAR down to the next line...
>> num enum_field_types { DRIZZLE_TYPE_TINY,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_LONG,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_DOUBLE,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_NULL, DRIZZLE_TYPE_TIMESTAMP,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_LONGLONG,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_TIME,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_DATETIME,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_NEWDATE, DRIZZLE_TYPE_VARCHAR,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_VIRTUAL,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_NEWDECIMAL,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_ENUM,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_BLOB,
>> DRIZZLE_TYPE_MAX=DRIZZLE_TYPE_BLOB
>>
>> This is the extent of types, right?
>
> NULL is not a type...
>
> There is VARCHAR and BLOB, but no VARBINARY and CLOB. Lack of
> orthogonality?
>
> VIRTUAL is a property of a field, not a type.
Virtual is from the virtual columns implementation.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
