Revision number and/or a date sounds good. Makes it easy to lookup the repository and see what actually happened. So, ++
On the other hand, adding a major feature text not so much, since there could be multiple goodness in the release, which could make the filename rather long ;) Cheers, Toru On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > > We're planning on releasing the first tarballs of Drizzle in less than a > week. We'd like to get input on whether our ideas on release number are > hair-brained or not... > > Our plan is to release tarballs and releases that are simply named for the > Bazaar revision, whatever the rev is when we tag up the release. So, for > instance, the release might be just called "r914"... > > Would this work? Is there a better way of doing it that anyone is > interested in helping out with? > > Cheers, > > Jay > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- Toru Maesaka <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
