-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Starkey wrote: > Question: Why should structured be typedef-ed? Isn't this a bad habit > left over from C? All it does is making searching for the symbol > difficult. > > And why do structures have different naming conventions than classes? > Aren't they about the same thing? > > For reasons that I don't quite understand, I still use structs for > little things without methods; if nothing else, it saves the "public:" > line. Maybe we should all give up on structs...
Heh, yeah. :) AFAIK, other than scope protection, there's not much difference between a class and a struct from the point of view of the compiler's generated code... > Those quibbles aside, I congratulate drizzle on joining the camel case > world. Welcome! Hehe. - -j -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknHv8kACgkQ2upbWsB4UtHTzQCfSMG6i0NxXxdjWt5opKIU4ZFj 5XQAn1FpROXwmxyQDdXzN5l1X2PDGZsK =YH4a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
