Jim Starkey wrote: > John David Duncan wrote: >>>> For reasons that I don't quite understand, I still use structs for >>>> little things without methods; if nothing else, it saves the "public:" >>>> line. Maybe we should all give up on structs... >>> >>> Heh, yeah. :) AFAIK, other than scope protection, there's not much >>> difference between a class and a struct from the point of view of the >>> compiler's generated code... >> >> According to Mr. Stroustrup there is *no* difference. >> >> >> > Default access for class is private; default access for struct is > public. Otherwise, no difference. >
Yup - actually, that typedef structs thing should go. In c++, there is also no need to say "struct foo" everywhere... foo is fine. Monty _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
