Hi, On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Brian Aker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > So what do folks want: > string& foo; > > or > string &foo; > > I slightly prefer the first because it makes a few things simpler (aka... > like dropping the name of a param when we don't use it in a method), but > either way is fine. > > For pointer: > string *foo; > or > string* foo; > > I prefer the first, and I don't mind the clash in style. I'd like to pick > one though.
I prefer: string &foo; string *foo; I believe both should follow the same style i.e. we should be consistent and not have the placement of & be different than the placement of *. -Padraig > > Cheers, > -Brian > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
