On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:41:26 +0200, Arjen Lentz <[email protected]> wrote: > From observation, the appear to be other consequences to not > specifying a primary key for InnoDB, in terms of locking behaviour and > such. > So the implicit rowid/pk thing is, apparently, not quite equivalent.
my auto-increment implementation is quite different than the innobase one. Since we don't at all care about or support statement based replication, we can be a lot more sane in locking (or lack thereof). Although I'm not really caring about performance yet... in theory the embedded_innodb auto increment implementation should be much better. -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
