++ No, +10.
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Brian Aker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > On Apr 7, 2010, at 6:09 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Stewart Smith <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> So, for Embedded InnoDB, currently I have a requirement that all tables >>> must have a primary key. >> >> FWIW, I've never heard a good argument for not having a primary key on >> a table. Ever. > > Haven't I been saying we should require these? > > We can use hidden ones, like I pointed out in the earlier email, but I > suspect we would be better off just requiring them. > > This might fall into the bucket of "no hidden magic". > > Cheers, > -Brian > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
